logo
Where we work

Our work in 2021

BENEFICIARY COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES

In 2021, the GICHD supported national authorities, international and regional organisations and NGOs in 43 countries and territories.

The GICHD adapted to the COVID-19 pandemic by increasing its remote support. However, when in-person contact was deemed essential and destinations were accessible, GICHD staff travelled to provide on-site support, liaise with partners and donors, and organise workshops and training courses.

TitleLatitudeLongitudeDescription
Afghanistan34.5298287169.17238745
  • National strategies were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to good practice
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Angola-12.2860141117.67407767
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • Relevant concepts, methods and tools were captured in international standards
Armenia40.1829440744.51733362
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Azerbaijan40.3659096648.06707879
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Benin9.6687677982.426891184
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Bosnia and Herzegovina44.5877845317.74539415
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Burkina Faso12.46351616-1.755471132
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Cambodia12.81514143105.1059361
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Central African Republic6.64394472320.61330472
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
Croatia45.0956645314.88860369
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Colombia3.798903704-73.14739741
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Cyprus35.0484239533.23828739
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
Georgia42.1843279643.48560558
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
Germany51.1175154810.29693198
  • National strategies were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to good practice
Iraq33.1585691143.02322926
  • National strategies were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to good practice
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Jordan31.3448725736.74655209
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Kosovo42.6510793620.86850807
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Lao People’s Democratic Republic19.67434572102.4168213
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Lebanon34.1112984535.87966087
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Libya27.0948721617.27397533
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Mali17.92133393-1.781481732
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Mauritania20.19842838-10.70085053
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Niger17.587937089.318582737
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Nigeria9.7219359247.93680348
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
Palestine31.5138349634.47601896
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Papua New Guinea-6.630010353144.2883229
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
Senegal14.34059835-14.44295052
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Serbia44.1417929420.97457225
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
Solomon islands-9.647921021160.1316407
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Relevant concepts, methods and tools were captured in international standards
Somalia2.86407639245.25653142
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
South Sudan7.59927054330.20762455
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
Sri Lanka7.57956145380.93385864
  • National strategies were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to good practice
Sudan16.3733639530.48233675
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Syrian Arab Republic35.0105706338.5828885
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Tajikistan38.5537605570.9933891
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Thailand15.42962598101.3447021
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
Togo8.6690731511.005120955
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
Turkey39.0356453435.34638729
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Ukraine49.028634431.62897982
  • National strategies were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to good practice
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Regional cooperation furthered the exchange, and dissemination and adoption of good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • Relevant concepts, methods and tools were captured in international standards
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Vietnam14.58134726108.4015121
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
  • The reduction of risks from explosive ordnance contributed to humanitarian action and sustainable development
Western Sahara24.71872496-13.17492442
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
Yemen15.9162612947.50427845
  • National standards were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to international standards
  • States and other partners used quality information to support their programming and operational management
  • Land release was implemented by states and other partners, according to good practice
  • Risks from explosive ordnance were reduced in a gender and diversity sensitive and responsive manner
Zimbabwe-18.9583254230.2268197
  • National strategies were developed, adopted and implemented by states, according to good practice